The Courts of the State of San Andreas will entertain a litany of objections, including but not limited to the below specifically enumerated objections:
| Relevance | A party may object on the grounds of relevance when a piece of evidence or testimony has no tendency to make any fact pertinent to the matter more or less likely to the finder of fact. |
|---|---|
| Unfair/Prejudicial | A party may object to relevant evidence or testimony when the prejudice the evidence or testimony may introduce at court outweighs the probative value of the evidence. |
| Leading Question | A party may object to elicited testimony when the question inherently leads the witness to a specific answer. |
| Compound Question | A party may object to elicited testimony when the question asked contains two or more questions. |
| Argumentative | A party may object to elicited testimony when the questions seek to argue with previously submitted testimony rather than elicit new or unique information. |
| Asked and Answered | A party may object to repetitive questions which seek to elicit the same testimony as prior questions. |
| Vague/Ambiguous | A party may object to a question which is vague, ambiguous, or confusing and will risk the witness answering in an immaterial or nonconstructive manner. |
| Non-Responsive | A party may object to elicited testimony as non-responsive when it does not answer the question originally posed by counsel. |
| Speculation | A party may object to either testimony which is speculatory in nature, or a question which requires the witness to speculate in their answer. |
| Hearsay | A party may object to either a question or testimony which introduces the statement of an individual who is not present in court, asserting it for the truth of the matter of the statement. |
| Opinion | A party may object to a question or testimony which elicits an opinion which the witness is not qualified to present before the court. |
| Scope | A party may object that the subject matter of the question goes beyond the subject matter of direct examination, or the prior examination, of the witness. |
| Misstates Evidence/Misquotes Witness | A party may object that the question itself misstates the evidence cites or misquotes prior testimony. |